KCLUG

kclug@kclug.org

3239 discussions

Start a nNew thread

"free software" magazine
by David Nicol 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_01/

1 0

AMD Turion
by Brian Kelsay 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050107-4510.html http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3456411 http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20050110_124351.html Anybody heard any real details on this 64-bit mobile processor? One thing's for certain, it'll put out enough heat to bake your walnuts. Anyone actually use one of the Athlon-64-Mobile chips in a laptop? I know dj_goku has drooled over them, but let's hear from someone that has used one. Brian Kelsay

1 0

Re: Meeting time
by mike＠handuma.com 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

It was basically a freeze out. The library closed and only two people made it to Denny's -- Hal and myself. Next time it'll be different. Michael handuma.com http://www.handuma.com

5 4

RE: Infrared scanners for recording fingerprints and Linux
by Brian Densmore 11 Jan '05

11 Jan '05

The problem there is sensitivity. Children's fingerprints can be quite densely compacted and getting a clear print may be challenging to say the least. Basically I have been asked to improve on the CHIPS program for child protection. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Hutchins [mailto:hutchins@tarcanfel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:42 AM > To: kclug(a)kclug.org > Subject: Re: Infrared scanners for recording fingerprints and Linux > > > On Tuesday 11 January 2005 10:33 am, Gerald Combs wrote: > > > Jonathan Hutchins wrote: > > > A conventional scanner would give you the flexability to take > > > fingerprints, palmprints, and/or footprints. That would > probably be a > > > better way to go. The fingerprint scanners I've seen are > mostly intended > > > to take a single, adult finger. > > > Does a conventional scanner have enough resolution and/or > contrast to > > pick up the ridges in a fingerprint? Would it show all of > the loops, > > arches, and whorls, or a picture of a finger? > > I was thinking of taking a conventional print first, then > scanning that. > _______________________________________________ > Kclug mailing list > Kclug(a)kclug.org > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug >

1 0

Infrared scanners for recording fingerprints and Linux
by Brian Densmore 11 Jan '05

11 Jan '05

Anyone done anything with this? A friend has asked me to build a system to record a child's fingerprints, photos, and general characteristics in a user friendly manner and write the data to a "business card cd". Doing all from a laptop. I can handle the photo and the user-friendly interface easily enough, but don't know where to start with the IR fingerprint scanner. Also, I'm not entirely sure an IR fingerprint is the way to go. Brian Densmore CompuTech Business Solutions, Inc. (816) 880-0988 ext. 215 densmoreb(a)ctbsonline.com

4 4

Hylafax dial-up problem
by Jonathan Hutchins 11 Jan '05

11 Jan '05

Running Gentoo Linux kernel 2.4.22, Hylafax 4.2.0-r1 from portage. I have the following settings in /var/spool/fax/etc/ /var/spool/fax/etc/config.usb_tts_0: GettyArgs: "-b -r -s %s %l" /var/spool/fax/etc/setup.cache: PATHEGETTY='/bin/false' /var/spool/fax/etc/setup.cache: PATHGETTY='/usr/sbin/mgetty' /var/spool/fax/etc/setup.cache: PATHVGETTY='/usr/sbin/vgetty' To achieve this, I edited /usr/sbin/faxsetup and changed PATH_GETTY=/sbin/agetty to PATH_GETTY=/usr/sbin/mgetty then ran faxsetup. When I dial in to the system, the log shows: FaxGetty[4308]: GETTY: START "/sbin/agetty -b -r -s 19200 usb/tts/0", pid 4327 The only way I've been able to get dial-up to work is to rename /sbin/agetty and make it a symlink to /usr/sbin/mgetty.

1 0

RE: unmounting a volume
by Brian Kelsay 10 Jan '05

10 Jan '05

2.6 may be stable, but on my laptop I can't use it. I still have a funky wireless card that doesn't yet have a finished 2.6 driver. I have everything working fine with Mepis installed to harddrive and the wireless card auto loading at boot. If I were to get some newer hardware I might try 2.6, but for now it's not necessary. Brian Kelsay >>> "Brian Densmore" <> 01/10/05 11:34AM >>> FYI: 2.6 is not a development kernel, per definition. 2.6 is the current "stable" kernel and 2.4 is the "deprecated" (or whatever they call it) kernel. I've had no major issues with 2.6, but not something I would use on a production machine. IIRC, there is no current development kernel? There is no 2.7 right? Any ideas when if they are going to begin work on the next development kernel? Or are they just going to keep tweaking 2.6 until it's really stable? Did they pull a Microsoft on us with 2.6? What's your /opinion? > -----Original Message----- > From: Duane Attaway > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Brian Kelsay wrote: > > > What kernel are you running? Is it a 2.6? I still use 2.4 > series and ... > > > I was running 2.6.9 and am currently using 2.4.28 on my gentoo system > while I enjoy my USB mp3 player. I'm going to wait until 2.6 > becomes a > bit more mature as work is eating up most of my spare time.

1 0

RE: unmounting a volume
by Brian Densmore 10 Jan '05

10 Jan '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Duane Attaway > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Brian Densmore wrote: > > > FYI: 2.6 is not a development kernel, per definition. 2.6 > is the current > > "stable" kernel and 2.4 is the "deprecated" (or whatever > they call it) > > Gentoo currently has the gentoo-dev-sources defined as the Not to nit-pick, but ... gentoo <> kernel developers. This probably has more to do with not having broken links in gentoo than anything else. (Not that I don't agree with calling 2.6 developmental, but from a purely official point of view it's a stable release as are all even numbered kernels) > 2.6.x series, > so that appears to be where they are testing all kinds of fun patches. Again, not nit-picking, but... ;') This behavior, on the part of kernel maintainers, is no different than it has ever really been. Is it? > > The 2.4 series seems to be extremely stable, No argument from me. > yet much slower I hadn't noticed any speed difference between either 2.4 or 2.6 > and without all the nice extras of 2.6. I hadn't noticed any extras in 2.6 that are missing from 2.4. But then my needs are simple and for the most part I could probably shuffle along just fine with a kernel 2.2. For those of you who live out there on the bleeding edge, well that's the price you pay. It's not called bleeding edge for no reason. I've done my time bleeding. I let others do it now.

1 0

RE: unmounting a volume
by Brian Kelsay 10 Jan '05

10 Jan '05

What kernel are you running? Is it a 2.6? I still use 2.4 series and have not ever had a USB hang like you describe. Since hotplug started taking care of USB I've not had a problem. Also, what distro are you running? This may make a difference because of what packages are included as part of your GUI environment and what default services are running. As for not being able to kill a process, is it possible that you were trying to kill a parent process while a child process was still busy/locked? Similar to trying to delete a directory that still has subdirectories that are not empty. Brian Kelsay >>> Duane Attaway <> 01/10/05 10:16AM >>> I mounted the volume through the command line with the mount command. I <snip> it. This is what I get for running development kernels and system. Its

3 2

RE: Altitude
by Brian Densmore 10 Jan '05

10 Jan '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Duston > > > Jonathan Hutchins wrote: > > > > > Actually, I believe that vacuum is a better insulator > than the gaseous > > > stew we use for atmosphere. > > > > Two words: "Vacuum Tube". > > Which requires a heater to remove the electrons from the > cathode and even > then there isn't a spark. If current flowed through the > vacuum even in the > absence of a heater, then no vacuum tubes would work. > > Also remember the 'L' in LCD stands for liquid. Get it too > cold and it > freezes. If the liquid contains water, it expands upon freezing. I'd > imagine that would destroy a notebook screen rather nicely. > LCD displays should have no problem operating down beyond -40 degrees C/F. Although response time will be noticeably slower and the voltage necessary to drive it would have to increase and the display logic would have to know how to deal with all this.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG